Pg33 top - "...Did he marry the individual with whom he committed adultery?.."
WTF?!?! - THE INDIVIDUAL?? Why gender neutral? Does this leave the door open for the possibility that the appointee may have gone homo?
Just wondering....
Edited:
Jesus!!!
This is NAZI, WTF?!?!
Pg38. top: "...Questions about a brother's qualifications would result if he
gave tacit approval to a marriage between a baptized
Christian and a person who is not baptized. Participating
in, supporting, or assisting in the courtship,
wedding, or reception implies approval. Questions
would also arise if the brother did not get
involved personally but allowed his wife or others in
his household to do so."
So if you allow your child to simply ATTEND a wedding reception of a lifelong JW friend, who just happen to fall inlove and marry a non-JW, your qualifications are questionable?!?. What the F@#K!. Man, this is sick..
Thanks Yknot!
Edit2:
Pg38, bottom: "...for example, the sin may involve past child abuse, and this would likely disqualify him formany years.-w971/1 pp. 26-29; w77 pp. 697-698."
This would LIKELY disqualify him?!? ARE YOU FREAKING NUTS - This SHALL immediately send him to jail, you morons!!
I am disgusted and done...